Mary to Andre: But SOM needs symbol manipulation to exist, and Pirsig says symbol manipulation IS the Intellectual Level. If we go with that, then SOM is contained within the Intellectual Level, but does not define it, thus disagreeing with Bo.
Andre: Desparately running behind in my reactions Mary..apologies. You are correct and I am thankful that you and others have pointed to (and explained) my error. Perhaps my emotions got the better of me in terms of wanting to 'force' an integration of the SOL with the MoQ. It cannot be done. Intellect as part of the S/O aggregate is a Western cultural phenomenon. Mary: Why do you say you are "with Bodvar on this one"? Andre: I have taken leave of Bodvar's position regarding the universality of intellect as the S/O logic.Or, for that matter, that S/O logic is the only pattern to have made it into the intellectual level. Or to turn this around, that the intellectual level only 'contains' S/O logic. Within the MoQ it doesn't make sense. The 'evidence' between the Oriental intellectual developments and (different) Western intellectual developments bear witness to this. That's why Mr. Pirsig doesn't understand Bodvar's conclusion and has little 'faith' in it..apart from a possible percolation- to --the- top effect....if it has value. I am not suggesting that this clears up other matters but sometimes it is good to just step away from the MoQ sometimes, take a breath, just stare at the thing once in a while and refocus. Thanks Mary, I enjoy your posts. Kind regards Andre Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
