Greetings Mary
Kidding aside, the Intellectual Level is a STATIC Level. It is not the > be-all end-all of reality. Pirsig says this. I think Bo's only problem > may > be in getting a little loose with his words sometimes. > > Mary > If by "STATIC" we mean "definitionaly bound", well I simply disagree. Where do you draw the upper boundary of intellectual patterning? Because once you get it bound, you talk about it, objectify and use it conceptually in further formulations which grow the old boundaries. Krimel's favorite argument, Quantum Mechanics, also demonstrates the inability of intellect to encapsulate reality, because when you think of the reality of light in one way, it's a particle. Think about it another, and its a wave. Reality breaks out of intellectual boundaries, why oh why can't I? Kidding reintroduced, "Pirsig says" is not the end-all, be-all of reality. :) John Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
