Bodvar to John and Multitude: This is about the MOQ looking down at the static levels! When will this dawn on you? The SOL is unassailable and when it can't be refuted people turn mean. For instance Ron and Andre with their once creepy "agreement with Bo" and then with equal creepy psychological attacks, Bo just defending some cerebrity position ...etc.
Well, it can be helped, when you can't win the ball, attack the player. Andre: Bodvar, to dismiss my (and John's and Dave's and Ron's and many other's) objections to the SOL argument on this basis is not conducive to further discussion. I hope you realise I deeply respect you but that doesn't mean I have to go along with everything you say. 'Creepy agreement'? I told you I have understood your SOL. Doesn't mean I go along with it. I agree, it does present wonderful views but ultimately they are short-sighted. The MoQ belongs in the valleys, not some lonely mountain top. Even the above statement that 'the MoQ is looking down at the static levels'.... . The static levels ARE the MoQ, within a DQ/SQ configuration.Nothing 'looking down' upon anything. You simply perpetuate your SOL in this way. As Dave T pointed out, you are very particular about what to address in your response to other's objections. Nothing 'psychological attacks' towards your person. You make universal claims which are not substantiated through empirical knowledge or experience. If you suggest that the SOL appears to dominate the Western 'mind-set' I think this is worthy of consideration but to generalise the SOL dominance even in yet to appear aliens goes too far. The celebrity bit? Well you want your SOL contribution to be recognised and even go so far as suggesting that the creator of the MoQ has it wrong. You want official (read cultural) recognition for this 'legacy'. That points to one thing as far as I am concerned. I didn't realise this was a contest of something. As far as my understanding of the MoQ goes it appears to me that it is not about winning or losing. It is about stimulating eachother to produce the highest quality patterns possible. Perhaps I am wrong...and on the wrong site. Andre Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
