Hey John, When it comes to whom to believe about global warming I'll take Princeton physicist Freeman Dyson over a political hack like Al Gore. Dyson wrote that climate change has become an "obsession," the primary article of faith for "a worldwide secular religion" known as environmentalism.
As for a "few esoteric scientific quibbles" over fudging data, the British Parliament takes the "quibbles" seriously enough to convene hearings to investigate the Climate Research Unit of East Anglia University, the major source of climate data for the Intergovermental Panel on Climate Change. The focus of the investigation? Data manipulation, date suppression and data integrity. So yes, we disagree on what constitutes "shown." Such is the nature of friendly debate. Regards, Platt. On 4 Feb 2010 at 16:31, John Carl wrote: > Platt I completely disagree, > > Now that the science of global warming has been shown to be fraudulent > > > > > When you say "shown" you surely jest. This implies that movies as popular > as Gore's Inconvenient Truth have been promoted by the media and seen by > all, or as many or even 1/4 the audience that he enjoyed. > > A few esoteric scientific quibbles over "fudging the data" in the newspapers > for a few days hardly compares with the many charts, graphics and visions of > glaciers melting into the sea that Gore's show put on for us. A show for > which he earned a Nobel Prize! Not to mention the many nova shows and such > on tv that I can't describe because I've never seen. How many "shows" have > you seen proclaiming global warming as a hoax? Few to none, I'm sure. > > Your idea of "shown" and mine are far, far apart I'm afraid. > > Sincerely, > > John Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
