Ham to Andre: Inasmuch as all processes are time-dependent events, what makes Quality "real" as opposed to subjects-objects whose experienced reality is denied? How do you justify this logical inconsistency?
Andre: What is logically inconsistent about DQ/SQ? They have both dependently arisen Ham. Quality does not exist in and of itself like some veil hanging behind the static patterns... as some Absolute 'entity'. Quality is not some Deity waiting to create SQ's because he is bored. DQ is a characteristic of SQ.(from a conventional pov.). It is the 'undifferentiaed aesthetic continuum' (Northrop). Ham: Yet, Quality (=Reality=Experience) is posited as undergoing the process of evolution to "betterness". Andre: Quality is not 'undergoing' anything Ham, Quality is what accounts for the dynamic 'aha' moments leading the MoQ to allow for a better explanation of SQ 'evolution'. Thank you,Ham Andre Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
