I'm not in the mood.  I have a headache.      
 
 


On Mar 9, 2010, at 1:01 PM, david buchanan wrote:

> 
> Marsha said to dmb:
> To speak of a reality that is a monism using a language that is based on a 
> dualistic reality comprised of subjects and objects is difficult.
> 
> 
> dmb says:
> 
> It's more difficult to talk about monisms and dualisms than it is to talk 
> about fish and breadsticks but that doesn't address the point. The point is 
> that you're treating intellectual static quality patterns as if they were 
> unpatterned, dynamic and ineffable. Concepts are not ineffable. When Pirsig 
> says that, "any philosophic explanation of Quality is going to be both false 
> and true precisely because it is a philosophic explanation", he is saying 
> that Quality is not conceptual but philosophic explanations are conceptual. 
> (ZMM, Chapter 20) This matches the claim he makes in chapter 5 of Lila, where 
> he says philosophical mystics, "share a common belief that the fundamental 
> nature of reality is outside language". It matches what he tells us in 
> chapter 9, where he says, "even the name, 'Quality' was a kind of definition 
> since it tended to associate mystic reality with certain fixed and limited 
> understandings." And then there is the explanation at the end of chapter 29, 
> where qu
 ot
> es William James saying, "there must always be a discrepancy between concepts 
> and reality, because the former are static and discontinuous while the latter 
> is dynamic and flowing". See?
> 
> He makes the same point when he says that the MOQ is a contradiction because 
> metaphysics is a philosophic explanation full of concepts and definitions 
> whereas Quality (DQ) is what you know prior to definitions, ahead of 
> definitons.
> 
> To use the ineffable, non-conceptual nature of Quality to shut down a 
> conversation about the meaning of concepts is, I think, not a legitimate 
> move. I mean, dealing with difficult concepts is one thing but treating them 
> as pre-conceptual and indefinable only confuses Pirsig's often repeated 
> point. Does that point make sense to you? You see what I'm saying?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>                                         
> _________________________________________________________________
> Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469229/direct/01/
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html


 
___
 

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to