On 3/10/10 11:14 AM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
<snip> Mystical raptures like religious ones are always combined with overwhelming emotions and emotions cannot fully be conveyed by language, sensation not at all, while philosophical insights are "conceptual" from the outset and can ONLY be conveyed by language. <snip> Hi Bo and all, Imho emotions are DQ. There is no individual organ to receive emotions. I perceive emotions as a level in evolution. The whole organic being changes like from happy to sad, and emotions can change ideas from positive to negative etc.. Emotions are DQ only. I agree only analogies and metaphors describe emotions. Emotions convey philosophical insights like DQ. I don¹t know how DQ is conceptualized to SQ from an emotional point of view without appealing to a dynamic/static, undefined/defined perceptive/conceptive description of reality? There is a physical pressure on organs receiving sensations and I do not know why you place sensations outside of language? I think hot or cold is a sensation. The interpretation of the vibration from the organ is either true or false and can be conveyed in language. I agree DQ is indefinable and is not a conception but a direct perception. There is always room for error in speech, which is conceptualized, SQ, rather than perceived, DQ. The logic of mathematics requires 1 to be defined, so mathematics is always conceptualized and its logic is subject to verification by perceived experience. Joe > Mystical raptures like religious ones are always combined with > overwhelming emotions and emotions cannot fully be conveyed by > language, sensation not at all, while philosophical insights are > "conceptual" from the outset and can ONLY be conveyed by > language. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
