I thought it was great too. I almost made the correction as , 'In fact, should I grovel to the gravel?'
On Mar 11, 2010, at 7:29 AM, Ian Glendinning wrote: > On the contrary Marsha, this is about the wonder of language, and the > freudian slip by your little ole fingers, created the bon-mot for how > low it is possible to grovel - down to the gravel in fact. My biggest > smile of the day so far in fact - please don't withdraw it ;-) It's > already in "my" dictionary. > > Regards > Ian > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 1:12 PM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> Should have been grovel, not gravel. >> >> >> >> On Mar 11, 2010, at 7:01 AM, MarshaV wrote: >> >>> >>> Horse, >>> >>> Dave may know what he's talking about, and I may not know what I'm talking >>> about, >>> but regardless of all my sniping, I wish Dave much success. >>> >>> Horse, should I gravel even lower? I can you know. And mean it. >>> >>> >>> Marsha >>> >>> >>> On Mar 11, 2010, at 6:05 AM, Horse wrote: >>> >>>> By being a bit more gracious and admitting that Dave does know what he's >>>> talking about? >>>> >>>> On 11/03/2010 08:18, MarshaV wrote: >>>>> How can one compete with the ample credit that Dave gives himself? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mar 11, 2010, at 2:52 AM, Ian Glendinning wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> DMB said >>>>>> >>>>>> "... this question about language and experience, at least roughly, is >>>>>> about whether it's possible to reconcile Rorty and James. And people >>>>>> like them too of course. C'mon admit it. That's interesting." >>>>>> >>>>>> Good. So yes that IS interesting. I though for a while there we were >>>>>> debating the no-brainer whether language (and tone and rhetoric and >>>>>> style of argument) were part of philosophy (or not ?!?!) Phew. >>>>>> >>>>>> I think Matt (and gav and others) are right though ... that there is >>>>>> an important style difference between "professional philosophy" on the >>>>>> one hand, trying to situate these arguments in the existing (US >>>>>> Pragmatist) canon, and those of us amateurs on the other who are >>>>>> simply comfortable with the obvious facts, enough to get with worrying >>>>>> about how best to apply them to real life beyond professional >>>>>> philsophy. >>>>>> >>>>>> I think Dave deserves some credit for the former - even if it sets up >>>>>> a viscious cycle of mutual frustration between the professionals and >>>>>> the amateurs. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> Ian >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving >>>> safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but to skid in sideways, >>>> chocolate in one hand, wine in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally >>>> worn out and screaming "WOO HOO what a ride!"... Hunter S Thompson >>>> >>>> >>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list >>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >>>> Archives: >>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html >>> >>> >>> >>> ___ >>> >>> >>> Moq_Discuss mailing list >>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >>> Archives: >>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html >> >> >> >> ___ >> >> >> Moq_Discuss mailing list >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> Archives: >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html >> > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
