Bo said:
You affirm my point that DMB's about MOQ's dynamic/static
corresponding to James' pre-conceptual/conceptual schism
is wrong. You have by the way made many good,
SOL-supporting, observations of late, but I guess you'll
rather be found dead than agreeing with me, thanks anyway.
Matt:
Hey, steal what you want from me. Just don't assume I'm
resisting you because you're unfashionable. If I cared about
fashion, _I'd_ be more fashionable, but if you haven't noticed
I have my own problems.
Though I have to admit, I usually resist taking out articles of
faith--like becoming a Skutvikist--because I generally resist
taking out articles of faith.
I haven't followed any recent clarification of the disagreement
between you and Dave, but if his point is that Pirsig's
dynamic/static distinction matches with a
pre-conceptual/conceptual distinction, then you've got one
strong strike against thinking it doesn't in Pirsig's view--there's
strong evidence, via the notion of "pre-intellectual cutting
edge of experience," that that is exactly what Pirsig thinks.
I think it's a bad idea, but that's a separate issue from what
Pirsig meant and thinks is a good and bad idea. So despite the
fact that it sounds like bad mojo for DMB and Pirsig, the
exegetical point goes to Dave.
Matt
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your
inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID27925::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:032010_2
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
