Greetings Ham,

On Apr 15, 2010, at 2:10 PM, Ham Priday wrote:

>> 
>> James was very influenced by reading Eastern texts, and rather than
>> reading James's interpretation of a poor translation, I think I'll stick to
>> reading Buddhist's texts directly.  Today there are wonderful, in-depth,
>> scholarly translations of very old Pali texts, and it is not a dead 
>> philosophy
>> so there are knowledgeable scholars and practitioners to answer questions.
>> RMP has spoken as much about Buddhism as about the American
>> Pragmatists.  He has identified himself as a Buddhist.
> 
> I'll accept that profile, despite the fact that the MOQ has been promoted by 
> several in this forum as an example of "radical empiricism", with William 
> James and other pragmatists cited as the founders of this philosophical 
> approach.  (I'm surprised that you haven't been involved in those 
> discussions.)

You shouldn't be surprised; I'm a "stupid" relativist who thinks Protagoras had 
it right all along, and I prefer the Buddha's Emptiness (Quality) and 
conventional/relative truth (static quality) to anything I've heard about 
William James.  Buddhism is also pragmatic and based on empiricism.  I haven't 
found the WJ discussions to ever get off the ground. j  Even Horse and Arlo, 
who seems to think they need to defend dmb, have not participated in any WJ 
discussion.  But let me ask you:  Why haven't you participated in any 
discussion concerning the WJ, pragmatism and/or radical empiricism?    
 
Thank you for the discussion.  On some level I often find your comments 
agreeable.  And you actually do a great job of defending the MoQ.  Your unique 
language gets me confused, but also the fact that I cannot find an autonomous 
self or independent objects and therefore reject them.  I find 'First' or 
'Primary' unnecessary adjectives, but we will continue this another day I'm 
sure.  

Thanks Ham,



Marsha
 
 
 
 
 
___
 

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to