Ian
23 Apr.
Bo
> > what did I do to deserve this?
> What did you do to deserve that response ? Here's an example
> "[Bo] Andre does not represent the MOQ (rather the weak(minded)
> interpretation) so don't take him too seriously."
My remark to Andre was AFTER you set the new low standard for un-
called for harsh remarks. No need to by sly Guy.
> If you can't debate or argue, don't resort to anti-personal rhetoric.
I have done nothing but debate, but its water on geese backs. The
SOL point is that SOM was the intellectual level (before the MOQ
revealed its true role) In LILA Pirsig writes:
Or, within historical time, the day Socrates died to establish the
independence of intellectual patterns from their social origins. .
Need I spoon-feed you weak-interpreters? (*) In a ZAMM context
Socrates represents SOM's independence from the Aretê past, here
he is said to represents the intellectual level's independence of its
social origin (all levels have their origin in the former level).Without
resorting to smoke-screens, how is this glaring fact explained?
Bodvar
PS
(*) "Weak" refers to the weak and strong interpretations of Quantum
Mech. which bears strong resemblance to our respective
interpretations of the MOQ.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
