Ian, All.
20 Apr.:
Bo to Dave:
> "All levels have been "leading edges" and have in turn spawned new
> levels. Intellect has now spawned the MOQ and is left as static as
> static comes. If intellect is seen as "most dynamic" and able of
> coming up with (what you see as intellectual patterns) new ideas -
> even a new metaphysics that denounces the MOQ - i.e. abolishes the
> whole moral level hierarchy - what then?"
Ian
> Almost, but not quite. The newly (more dynamic) MOQ level is allowed to
> dominate new "intelectual" patterns arising from the (static)
> intellectual level,.....
At least you see the MOQ as a (meta-) level that contains, and thus
dominates, the intellectual level ("allows" it things) and THAT is the
point. While DMB and the "weak" interpreters says that the MOQ is
contained by the intellectual level and thus is at its mercy. If a new
intellectual idea, theory, metaphysics (which is DMB's definition of
In.PoVs) lodges on top of the MOQ it will become a lower intellectual
value. What then?
> ...... BUT we are allowed to believe that the MoQish level might
> improve on itself in the course of time. If it's a MOQish improvement,
> why would we MOQists fight it?
It? Do you mean the SOL? You show that you are a MOQist by
starting to lean towards the SOL, while those dead against are so
because they have never understood the MOQ, their moqism just
more somism.
Bodvar
PS.
Are you still in this country? Have you noticed the furor over the
"Brainwash" (Hjernevask) TV program where the nature/nurture
enigma is rehashed again and the nature (gene) camp hits back on
the sociologists . All is based on SOM's impossible S/O dichotomy.that
has no solution. I have tried to reach one of the the Oslo papers with a
letter about the MOQ, but ...alas not having an academic title.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
