Mary:
On what basis do you make you claims? Sorry, but I just don't see any merit to 
your objections or accusations.
Again, I don't see how it can make any sense to reject James against Pirsig, 
especially since it was Pirsig who equated them. What this equation adds to the 
MOQ is about a hundred years of commentary, criticism, debate and development 
of these central ideas. Pirsig puts the MOQ in the mainstream of American 
pragmatism because it fits there but also because he wants it to catch on. I 
mean, this equation has to be philosophically accurate but it's a political and 
practical choice too. 
By the way, James did get into something like the levels toward the end of his 
career in "A PLURALISTIC UNIVERSE". But the diagnosis Pirsig makes about the 
conflict between social and intellectual values is based largely on historical 
events that unfolded after James's lifetime. The Victorian era was very 
confused about such things and I don't know that James was able to transcend 
his own context in that regard. But then again Pirsig is only adding a caveat 
to a very old distinction between mythos and logos AND that's not the feature 
of James's work that Pirsig identifies with anyway. Like I said, Pirsig equates 
James's "immediate flux" with DQ or the primary empirical reality and James 
even uses the same terms; Static and Dynamic. 


 
> [Mary Replies] 
> There is a difference between what you describe here as James' version of DQ
> and Pirsig's.  Pirsig's philosophy is built on the idea of the 4 levels each
> valuing different things and a DQ with an emphasis on the "Q" from which
> these values spring.  Pirsig's DQ is not random and amorphous.  It has
> direction and value at its core.  James' does not.
> 
> That being the case, What does the Intellectual Level value?  If you contend
> it to be thinking itself, then what does thinking itself value that differs
> from the values of the other levels, and what value does James bring to the
> conversation?

                                          
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your 
inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to