Bodvar to Andre: However something induced them to quit this - that came to be the obsession of the West - to embrace the development that resembles the early MOQ with the S/O the only static fall-out of the Dynamic Buddha nature (I'm not versed in their terminology) .
Andre: I am Bodvar, I am: cowdung! Cowdung Bodvar. The Buddha rests just as comfortably in cowdung as in the electrical circuits of a motorcycle. Bodvar: but what is adamant is that all and any intellectual development must be based on the subject/object distinction in some or other form, it must to fulfill its role of subduing social values! Andre: No. It only fulfills your SOM/SOL argument. Bodvar: For the creator of a metaphysics that has as its purpose to transcend the mental/material distinction it's quite a mouthful. Andre: As said to Mary the other day, I'd rather be hit by an idea (intellectual PoV i.e. subjective) than by a rock (inorganic PoV i.e. objective)! To 'transcend' THAT distinction can be very dangerous. Bodvar: I know and agee profoundly with the upper-level-out-of-the-lower tenet, and that all levels reveals its parent if pursued deep and far enough. Andre: If pursued deep and far enough we end up with Quality. Bodvar: No trouble at all, but MOQ's point is that the MORAL code between the levels is absolute. Andre: In the MOQ there are no absulutes. Bodvar: ...you are the only "orthodox" left who forwards some kind of defense from MOQ reasoning. Andre: Glad you think so but I believe you are mistaken in the 'only' bit. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
