Marsha, Andre. 16 June.
Marsha to Andre: > With MoQ representing Reality = Quality(unpatterned > experience(DQ)/patterned experience(sq)), there is no 'I' to be hit, > and no-thing to hit it. You write gibberish too. When focus is on the "high ground" this applies, however, when it is on the static plane - with intellect our preferred abode - there are subjective egos and objective bodies and the whole S/O menagerie. Andre: > Upon first reading I thought this was a very astute observation Marsha > but a second reading taught me that it is a rather silly one. The MOQ > is a STATIC representation of reality. It is not Reality itself.... Your words flows so easily - like DMB's about all MOQ-talk taking place on "intellect" - you both have the immense weight of the SOM behind you, while I desperately try to carve out a foothold for a MOQ vocabulary . The notion of everything written or thought are subjective "representation" of something NOT subjective and thought, is so firmly cemented that you feel a righteous fury if this is questioned. But what is revolution if not revolutionary? > Bodvar has objectified it and in this little response you have too. He > loves it, he lives in it. For him it is experience itself!!! but the > MOQ does NOT contain DQ! It's as dead as a doornail. The SOM glasses are so firmly glued on your nose that if/when I say that the the DQ/SQ is reality you say I have "objectified" it. The MOQ is out of SOM and to escape it it had to show objectively how its system is best. But the moment it is established the S/O premises are limited to the static intellectual leve. Bodvar Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
