Hi Bo, > Marsha to Andre: > > With MoQ representing Reality = Quality(unpatterned > > experience(DQ)/patterned experience(sq)), there is no 'I' to be hit, > > and no-thing to hit it. You write gibberish too. > > When focus is on the "high ground" this applies, however, when it is on > the static plane - with intellect our preferred abode - there are > subjective egos and objective bodies and the whole S/O menagerie. > > Andre: > > Upon first reading I thought this was a very astute observation > Marsha > > but a second reading taught me that it is a rather silly one. The MOQ > > is a STATIC representation of reality. It is not Reality itself.... > > Your words flows so easily - like DMB's about all MOQ-talk taking > place on "intellect" - you both have the immense weight of the SOM > behind you, while I desperately try to carve out a foothold for a MOQ > vocabulary . The notion of everything written or thought are subjective > "representation" of something NOT subjective and thought, is so firmly > cemented that you feel a righteous fury if this is questioned. But what > is revolution if not revolutionary? > [Mary Replies] "the immense weight of the SOM" had its origins in the Biological Level where discreteness was primary. This is part and parcel of the evolutionary arrow of ego as life-preserver, life-sustainer. SOM is the logical end of the road for this path and cannot be otherwise, a necessary pattern of value that obscures Patterns of Value. There is no other logical conclusion one can reach without a complete paradigm shift. The paradigm shift was Pirsig's achievement, and the enormity of it cannot be appreciated if your own "metaphysical sock" has not been turned.
Best, Mary Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
