Bodvar, Isnt self/other another way of saying subject/object? -Ron
----- Original Message ---- From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sat, June 19, 2010 3:51:57 AM Subject: Re: [MD] Transhumanism Ron, All. 18 June: Andre: > > > And you are according it the highest (intellect)ual status...and > > > defend it to the tooth! Bodvar: > > The proverbial in-out metaphysical turn that made SOM into the static > > intellectual level also robbed it of the authority to make morals > > "subjective", on the contrary its subject/object distinction became a > > moral subset. So it's possible to defend intellect and attack SOM. Ron: > I'd like to know how you seemingly place the s/o distinction on the > biological level then claim that it IS the intellectual level. > can you answer this? Where do I place the S/O distinction on the biological level? I think it's Mary and I haven't yet figured out her assertion. All levels have an "self/not self" arrangement that their respective immune systems are built on, but biology's is definitely not S/O-ish, rather "this body/foreign body. Bodvar Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
