Hi Bo, Ron Self/other reflects the same dualism of subject/object that the MOQ relegates to the intellectual level. In both "splits" values are completely absent. Thus, from the MOQ perspective they are synonyms.
Platt On 21 Jun 2010 at 9:52, [email protected] wrote: > Ron > > 19 June you asked: > > > Isnt self/other another way of saying subject/object? -Ron > > No, the subject/object distinction implyes something much more > "grave". Exactly what ZAMM tells about as SOM. Why ask me when > you have it all in that book. It was the emergence (not in its modern > full-fledged form) of the detached subject independent of the objective > world it observes. NB! don't start about the paradoxes this creates, > THAT is MOQ's very purpose to "repair". > > Bodvar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
