Firstly Marsha, I (a "subject") will by (your) "convention" and practical contextual necessity (I'm not in a position to give you a hug right now) use email composed of words (representing or at least implying "objects") .
Secondly, I will (as you did) use the rhetorical convention and answer your question with a question "How long have you got" ?". That piece of rhetoric means (even though not explicitly represented in the words) whether I give you a short answer or a long answer it cannot be a complete explanation in those (conventional) SOMist terms. Even if I reduce in terms of the smallest atoms (objects) I can conceive. Thirdly, I understand you've not got long ....off to the beach ? So I will assume for now, that your asking the question was simply a rhetorical response to Ron's question. Have a good break. Ian On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 10:00 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ian, > > How do intellectual patterns function? > > > Marsha > > > > On Jun 30, 2010, at 3:27 AM, Ian Glendinning wrote: > >> Hi Ron, good question >> >>> Platt., Marsha, >>> How would you say SOL provides greater explanatory power? >> >> This of course is hung up on what "explantion" means - I was hoping we >> could get there ever since DMB made some complaints about scientific >> reductionism - and get off this interminable Bo, Platt, Marsha SOLAQI >> treadmill. >> >> For anyone whose standard of expalantion is SOMist (objective, >> logical, reductive) I suspect SOL is a good explanation. For a MOQist, >> it's not. >> >> Ian > > > > ___ > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
