Hi Matt, I did say "even" Matt .... you weren't the worst offender by a long chalk ;-)
The only point of yours that actually got my hackles up was the "I haven't followed the threads that led to this decision (but I'll opine anyway)" angle. For me this wasn't the time for even handed tolerance - yes "even" Ian can say that. Bo has had several metric tonnes of tolerance over the last 8 to 10 years. Horse was drawing a line. The only "moral" issue here is Bo's ignorance of the "Bo SOL" issue is clogging up the entire MD bandwidth. The issue that many of us do ignore him for long periods - until he starts perverting new correspondents with his "my story is the Pirsig story" rhetoric. Give it a break Bo. Ian PS and yes, Platt would be ahead of Bo in the queue, from my perspective, but this argument isn't about fairness as a concept. On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 7:39 PM, Matt Kundert <[email protected]> wrote: > > Was I holier than thou? Yikes, I am sorry Ian. I was trying > to give both a very perspectivized opinion, rather than > God's (I am, after all, a target for "you're distorting the > MoQ"), and a very practical justification for thinking that > administratively this is not the best move (and not an > end-of-the-world move either) and a justification for > thinking that Horse's rationale for the move cuts into a lot > of other ships. > > I thought I was fairly even-keeled, and terribly un-moralistic > (in comparison to Platt). Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
