Hi X acto, > [X acto] > One side justifys their beliefs by rejecting half of Pirsigs work > > the other justifys their beliefs by the inclusion,and consistentcy > of all of Pirsigs work. > > They are able to give explanations for why they value this > interpretation > > while the other can not give an explanation outside the interpretive > factor. > > one is narrow and exclusive the other broad and inclusive. > > one side is a better explanation than the other. > > To begin the dialog, lets ask. >
[Mary replies] A dialog is a conversation undertaken with some level of mutual respect. Perhaps someone else can engage with you, but I'm not comfortable that this is a dialog. Best, Mary Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
