Ron, This somehow seems like the difference between static value (patterns) and value judgements (good! - bad! or reasonable - irrational!). I see the same issue with Magnus. Do you see value and value judgements as different, or the same? Marsha
On Jul 17, 2010, at 10:49 AM, X Acto wrote: > > > [Platt] > Reason (SOM) expanded human understanding of levels 1 and 2, but in so doing > left values in the dust and lost them there, going so far as to deny their > existence. The MOQ takes humanity to a new promontory of understanding where > one can see, if he will only open his eyes, a new reality of Quality (values) > whose structure makes reason (SOM) subordinate. > > Ron: > SOM is not reason. Reason, or giving reasons for our beliefs instead of > blind acceptance, is the intellectual level. SOM dominates reason > because the explanations it provides yield a convincing arguement. > > But your explanation above sounds more like it relies on blind acceptance. > Because it rejects reasons for justifications of belief. Per SOL/SIM > or whatever it's being called to avoid persecution by the moderator > which convieniantly rejects any reasons for it's beliefs. > > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
