dmb said to Krimel:
Like the classic-romantic split or the static-dynamic distinction, the idea is 
to include them both. The idea is to integrate reason and the affective domain 
to produce an expanded and improved form of rationality.

Krimel replied:
Who has disputed this? 


dmb says:

You did. I was disputing what you said right after you said it. This is what 
you said:
"If we have been overzealous in sublimating emotion and values since the 
enlightenment, it is a sublimation that emotion and value richly deserved. 
Humanity was governed by its emotional values for millennia. If reason finally 
got a chance to take charge for a change I say, bully for it. ... the function 
of reason is inhibitory. It serves to override the emotions and stop us from 
acting on the immediate emotional "value" of the present. It helps 
ussubordinate what feels good to what makes sense."


I say "integrate" where you say "sublimate", "inhibit", "override", "stop" and 
"subordinate". See the difference? That means there is a dispute. 

dispute |disˈpyoōt|nouna disagreement, argument, or debate : a territorial 
dispute between the two countries | the question in dispute is altogether 
insignificant. See note at quarrel .


Idiot.





                                          
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your 
inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to