Bo said to dmb:
Spot on Dave and thanks for not letting the "debunk Bo" urge get the best of
you. I admire you for that.
dmb says:
Thanks Bo, but I certainly had no intention of defending your position. As far
as I'm concerned it has already been thoroughly debunked and the those who
think otherwise simply do not comprehend what SOM of the MOQ is, especially you
and Platt.
Bo said to dmb:
Symbols (vs what is symbolized) and abstractions (vs concrete) are part of
intellect's S/O.
dmb says:
This is a misconception and it is just one of many examples. In the MOQ, the
difference between abstractions and concrete reality is the difference between
static intellectual patterns and direct everyday experience. It's the
difference between sq and DQ. You are simply misconstruing the MOQ as SOM.
I really, really hate what you're doing to this place, clogging it up with this
hair-brained nonsense all the time. I listened to it for over a decade now and
I'm just sick to death of it. Please, get a hobby. Go away. Let us do
philosophy, will you? That would be "a promising development".
_________________________________________________________________
The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_3
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
