On Jul 19, 2010, at 2:37 PM, John Carl wrote: > Well Marsha, just because you can refute Robbins, doesn't mean you have to > or want to. > > Why do something just because you can? > > Unless it's something really important like licking your own... oops, you > don't have those, do you. > > Do you? > > As you say, it's so tricky in this wide world of virtual reality to really > know who has what. > > Throwing away your father's bible can be very therapeutic. But if all you > got to show for it after all this time is "not this, not that", I'd dust off > the coffee grounds and eggshells and wipe away the blood and look for > something more positive.
John, You can be such a patronizing dunderhead. I didn't throw away my father's bible, I threw away the bible and the father dwelling within it. Marsha > > But then, that's me. > > > yours as usual, > > > John > > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 10:47 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > >> John, >> >> Too much like whenever and whatever you, John, say it is... Sure, you're >> cute, but so what? I most certainly can refute Tom Robbins. I threw my >> bloody bible (father and all) into the the garbage and heaped on coffee >> grounds and egg shells. >> >> With care, >> >> Marsha >> >> >> >> >> On Jul 19, 2010, at 1:34 PM, John Carl wrote: >> >>> You bet greed and materialism evolved for reasons, Marsha. But were they >>> good reasons? Or bad reasons? >>> >>> The age old question, asked of Dorothy by the munchkins, "Are you a good >>> witch? Or a bad witch?" >>> >>> Applying the question to reason itself, I'd say that Reason has >> definitely >>> been a good thing. It's freed women, men and children from the >> oppressions >>> of nature, allowing humanity to blanket the earth with comfortable >>> fecundity. >>> >>> Unfortunately, what men, women and children have done with their freedom >> is >>> another story entirely. >>> >>> Reason has its limits, that aren't reason's fault. >>> >>> Anymore than its my hammer's fault that it's not an open-end 7/16 inch >>> wrench. >>> >>> And I still think things like to be realized, and that's why there's >>> intellect. >>> >>> Water invented man, so it could walk around and tell stories. >>> >>> You can't refute Tom Robbins, >>> >>> Take care, >>> >>> John >>> >>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 11:51 PM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On Jul 19, 2010, at 1:41 AM, John Carl wrote: >>>> >>>>> Well yes. But its a relationship created by the thinking. Not >>>> naturally >>>>> arising just because granite, gravity and protons are "there". >>>>> >>>>> In other words, consciousness evolved for a reason. Or reason evolved >>>> for a >>>>> reason, and that reason is that gravity, protons and granite like to be >>>>> realized. >>>> >>>> >>>> John, >>>> >>>> Reason evolved for a reason? Either it did or it didn't. Oh goodie, >> than >>>> greed >>>> and Materialism evolved for a reason. Long live Plato and Aristotle!!! >>>> Down >>>> with all women!!! Down with passion and heart!!! (sarcastically >> written) >>>> >>>> Or maybe reason evolved with a twenty-five-hundred year-old distortion, >> a >>>> masculine dis-ease, so pleased is he with his own ability to destroy. >>>> Yes, I _think_ that is more likely. >>>> >>>> >>>> Marsha >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> so make their day. Think about them and fulfill their (and your) >>>> destiny. >>>>> >>>>> Happy thinking, dear Marsha, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 2:13 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Greetings, >>>>>> >>>>>> Do lead, granite, gravity and protons, all as patterns, have a >>>> relationship >>>>>> with >>>>>> thinking/thoughts/consciousness? Do all patterns from all levels have >> a >>>>>> relationship with thinking/thoughts/consciousness? I do not mean to >>>>>> insinuate >>>>>> that they are just ideas, but that they have a relationship with >>>> thinking. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Marsha >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ___ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list >>>>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >>>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >>>>>> Archives: >>>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >>>>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html >>>>>> >>>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list >>>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >>>>> Archives: >>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >>>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ___ >>>> >>>> >>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list >>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >>>> Archives: >>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html >>>> >>> Moq_Discuss mailing list >>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >>> Archives: >>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html >> >> >> >> ___ >> >> >> Moq_Discuss mailing list >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> Archives: >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html >> > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
