Ignore, I made a mistake in sending this post...   - Marsha 

On Aug 4, 2010, at 11:00 AM, MarshaV wrote:

> 
> 'Shop Class as Soulcraft'?  I've read Kant, Nietzsche, Hume, Descartes and 
> others when I was taking philosophy classes as an undergraduate student and 
> many others since, am I going to need to read 'Shop Class as Soulcraft' too?  
> 
> 
> 
> On Jul 30, 2010, at 9:35 PM, david buchanan wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> Arlosaid to Marsha:  Comments like this just make you look like an idiot. 
>> 
>> 
>> Marsha replied:  And it is like this comment of yours, Arlo, that reflects 
>> YOU as an idiot. 
>> 
>> 
>> dmb quotes Crawford:
>> 
>> "Pirsig's mechanic is, in the original sense of the term, an idiot. Indee, 
>> he exemplifies the truth about idiocy, which is that it is at once an 
>> ethical and a cognitive failure. The Greek idios mean 'private', and an 
>> idiotes mean a private person, as opposed to aperson in theior public role - 
>> for example, that of a motorcycle mechanic. Pirsig's mechanic is idiotic 
>> because he fails to grasp his public role, which entail, or shold, a 
>> relation of active concern to others, and to the machine. He is not 
>> involved. It is not his problem. Because he is an idiot.
>> This still comes across in the related English words 'idiomatic' and 
>> 'idiosyncratic', which similarly suggests self enclosure. For example, when 
>> a foreigner asks him for directions, the idiot will reply idiomatically, 
>> rather than refer to a shared coordinate system. H ealso lacks the attnetive 
>> oopeness that seeks thing out in the shared world, as when Pirsig's mechanic 
>> 'barely listened to the piston slap before saying, 'Oh yeah. Tappets'. At 
>> bottom, the idiot is a solipsist." (Matthew Crawford, "Shop Class as 
>> Soulcraft", page 98.)
>> 
>> 
>> dmb says:
>> 
>> Rather than refer to a shared coordinate system - for example the english 
>> language - the idiot will respond with idoisnycratic meanings and defintions 
>> of her own. She might, for example, define 'patterns" as "amorphous" or use 
>> "static" to mean "ever-changing". This is a cognitive failure as well as 
>> ethical failure. Plus it's really annoying and it's likely to draw 
>> unflattering comments from anyone who sees this idiocy. 
>> 
>> 
>> Sorry, but that's how it is. If you talk like an idiot, then that's just 
>> what people will say about you.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>                                        
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html


 
___
 

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to