On Aug 4, 2010, at 4:20 PM, [email protected] wrote:

> [Marsha]
>> Patterns of value are habits and bits, pieces & > threads of memory.   
> 
> Are you saying patterns of value are habits OF MEMORY and bits, pieces & 
> threads of memory?  


I meant habits AND bits, pieces & threads of memory.  



> If so, that makes it sound like a
> human invention.  


"Man is the measure of all things: of things which are, that they are, and of 
things which are not, that they are not".
    (Protagoras)  







> [dmb]
>> inorganic patterns of value are ideas derived > from experience.
> 
> But aren't ideas INTELLECTUAL patterns of value?  If so, you have inorganic 
> povs are intellectual povs.
> 
> [dmb]
>> The idea of matter was
>> invented to explain the felt resistances
>> encountered in experience.
> 
> It seems your argument is:
> 1) The idea of matter was derived from experience
> 2) matter is inorganic povs
> 3) :. inorganic patterns of value are ideas derived from experience.
> But why hold 2) rather than saying inorganic 
> povs are different than ideas?
> Craig 
> 
> 


 
___
 

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to