On Aug 17, 2010, at 2:40 AM, Magnus Berg wrote: > Hi Marsha > > On 2010-08-17 07:51, MarshaV wrote: >> Bo's SOL is a perspective on the subject-object problem, and how >> it relates to the MoQ. When I stated to Horse that my approach, >> which correlates to Bo's, developed from reading Buddhist texts, >> it was still suggested to "limit the conversation." Give me a >> fucking break!!! > > It's a perspective that has outlived the patience of the majority here. I was > able to get to the end of your patience with less than 10 posts this summer. > I'm sure you have the imagination to put yourself in our shoes after being > patient for more than 10 years. > > Regarding your approach using the Buddhist route, are you sure you would have > come to the same conclusion had you not known about Bo's version beforehand? > It seems to me that SOM is hardly something you'd read about in Buddhists > texts? > > Magnus
Magnus, Yes, I am quite sure my understanding developed from Buddhist texts. Buddhism is all about self and objects. But I had a head start by studying Hatha Yoga, Vedic texts and meditating in the 80's. Where does what you know come from? Marsha ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
