And back to the topic, sadly ... That page is as dubious as any Wikipedia page can be. (It has all the formal warning notices and editing history for all to see.)
As I keep saying, Wikipedia is useless as source of information on anything contentious. Dictionaries and encyclopaedias are by their nature conservative, and if they are not conservative, they are useless as dictionaries or encyclopaedias - therefore they are useless unless you are (a C) conservative QED. Nice try though Marsha. Ian On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Ian Glendinning <[email protected]> wrote: > BTW - just wanted to say - threads like this are the reason I stick > with MoQ-Discuss. > > All four seasons in a single day ... all four humours in a single thread. > > To quote Marsha (almost) "I get very excited when I see how well xxx > and yyy fit together and strengthen each other." > Onward and upward. > Thanks for making my day Marsha, Magnus ... and Horse of course. > Ian > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 8:57 PM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Magnus, >> >> Thanks for reading it. I get very excited when I see how well the MoQ and >> Buddhism fit together and strengthen each other. >> >> >> Marsha >> > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
