DMB
On 2010-08-26 00:49, david buchanan wrote:
Magnus said: What I'm saying is that since we have this tool of the
levels, and since it *is* a rather good fit for dividing this
undefined which is going on outside our concepts of it, why not try
to make it a better fit?
dmb replied: You're probably not going to believe this but the levels
do not divide the undefined.
Magnus replied to the reply: Did I ever say it did? The levels are
SQ, not DQ. Talk about fighting straw men.
dmb says:
You're denying that you ever said the levels divide the undefined!?
There must be some kind of translation problem because the sentence
in which you said that is right in front of both of us, right there
at the top. You said the levels are a tool "fit for dividing this
undefined which is going on outside our concepts of it". It could be
that you did not mean to say the levels are fit for dividing the
undefined. It could be that I don't understand what you mean by
saying it, but that is not a straw man. It's a direct quote.
Ah, I stand corrected.
However, I wasn't really serious about it being all that undefined. I
was just taking Krimel through the steps one by one. It was he who
conceded to something undefined going on outside our concepts of it, but
that undefined is simply Q, which is SQ/DQ and so on.
The levels are fit for dividing SQ, not DQ.
Magnus
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
