Krimel forgot about sarcasm:
I think I rely on it so much because unlike all of the techniques listed
previously, it is the only one that seems to pierce the fog. Something of what
I have attempted, through whatever amalgam of style and substance makes it
through. The aim is to upend your predictable patterns; to include some kind of
GOTO statement to force you out of your repeating loops,
dmb says:
Pierce the fog and upend my predictable patterns? Dude, think about what you're
saying. I've been in grad school for the past few years. How could it be even
be possible for me to avoid new thoughts and ideas?
I know, I know. Chalmers this and eliminative materialism that. Same old, same
old. Blah, blah, blah. How DO you stand it?
Dude, you really gotta realize that even bullshit needs a certain level of
plausibility for it to succeed as bullshit. That's just where the art begins.
Good God, you have no idea how badly I want to play poker with you. I've only
ever dreamed of playing against dudes who can bluff as well as you.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
