On Aug 26, 2010, at 5:41 AM, ADRIE KINTZIGER wrote: > Its in the finetuning of words, thinking;,..one of and the major error in > thinking is shortcutting.
Adrie, Gravity and evolution only became existent when they became isolated and objectified, and the objectification of both became patterns. The exact beginning of a pattern is of little interest to me because 'time' is also a pattern. Marsha > > Gravity and the effects of gravity were present before Newton, they only > became existing after bieng observed > Evolution and the effects of evolution were present before Darwin, they only > became existing after being observed. > > The mistake is not big , but the effects of the mistake are dramatical > > I will make an example. > statement... > "COLUMBUS DID DISCOVER AMERICA" > > False---, in fact it was like this, Columbus sailed to find a passage to the > West-Indies,dicovered the carribean islands > and called them , the West Indies, the naming is sometimes used until today. > This it wat he dicovered , the West Indies , and they do not even exist, he > sailed in the wrong direction. > Only after finding the continents North and South-America after this effort, > all science from that days had as an effect that discovering America was > forever connected to Columbus, but in fact discovering it was only a > side-effect of discovering the West-Indies. > It was an event generating a cascade of events.the endconclusion of this > proces is used. > > > It is shortcutted eversince, as Columbus did discover A.....etc > Shortcutting is a bad habbit , everybody is doeing it , i'm also, its a > people's habbit. > > greetzz, Adrie > > > 2010/8/26 MarshaV <[email protected]> > >> >> >> >> In other words, no way did 'gravity' exist before Newton, and also no way >> did 'evolution' exist before Darwin. What do you suppose 'conceptually >> constructed' means? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Aug 26, 2010, at 4:27 AM, MarshaV wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> The apple as we know it is a very modern invention developed by science. >> Centuries ago most apples were puny and not very edible. Before the time >> of Newton an apple falling was understood as an event in the seasonal life >> cycle of an apple tree, the apple falling was part of a process rather than >> the results of 'gravity.' Before becoming an isolated, independent force, >> falling was part of a natural process. Gravity was an objectification of >> science (an intellectual static pattern of value). Imagine that! >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> ___ >> >> >> Moq_Discuss mailing list >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> Archives: >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html >> > > > > -- > parser > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
