Its in the finetuning of words, thinking;,..one of and the major error in thinking is shortcutting.
Gravity and the effects of gravity were present before Newton, they only became existing after bieng observed Evolution and the effects of evolution were present before Darwin, they only became existing after being observed. The mistake is not big , but the effects of the mistake are dramatical I will make an example. statement... "COLUMBUS DID DISCOVER AMERICA" False---, in fact it was like this, Columbus sailed to find a passage to the West-Indies,dicovered the carribean islands and called them , the West Indies, the naming is sometimes used until today. This it wat he dicovered , the West Indies , and they do not even exist, he sailed in the wrong direction. Only after finding the continents North and South-America after this effort, all science from that days had as an effect that discovering America was forever connected to Columbus, but in fact discovering it was only a side-effect of discovering the West-Indies. It was an event generating a cascade of events.the endconclusion of this proces is used. It is shortcutted eversince, as Columbus did discover A.....etc Shortcutting is a bad habbit , everybody is doeing it , i'm also, its a people's habbit. greetzz, Adrie 2010/8/26 MarshaV <[email protected]> > > > > In other words, no way did 'gravity' exist before Newton, and also no way > did 'evolution' exist before Darwin. What do you suppose 'conceptually > constructed' means? > > > > > > > > On Aug 26, 2010, at 4:27 AM, MarshaV wrote: > > > > > > > The apple as we know it is a very modern invention developed by science. > Centuries ago most apples were puny and not very edible. Before the time > of Newton an apple falling was understood as an event in the seasonal life > cycle of an apple tree, the apple falling was part of a process rather than > the results of 'gravity.' Before becoming an isolated, independent force, > falling was part of a natural process. Gravity was an objectification of > science (an intellectual static pattern of value). Imagine that! > > > > > > > > > > ___ > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > -- parser Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
