On Aug 27, 2010, at 1:50 PM, David Thomas wrote:
> On 8/27/10 12:26 PM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Chalmers is now the first and last word on everything MoQ and SOM. Do none
>> of
>> you understand patterns?
>
> Intellectual progress (which you seem to deplore because somewhere RMP
> mentions "killing the intellect") at the level of theories is dependent
> upon comparing and contrasting differing ideas. That is what is being done
> in this thread and the consciousness one. If it's so boring or degrading or
> whatever that is what the delete key is for.
Hello Dave T,
Adrie had written:
Hence the reason why som cannot be the perfect umbrella for the
intellectual
level?
This doesn't sound like simply comparing and contrasting. It sounds like a
final judgement.
Marsha
>
> Possibly you could tackle the problem of reconciling "killing the intellect"
> with the intellectual level being the highest value stable patterns we
> humans have regular access to. And a one line not this-not that, or
> something having to do with mysticism and DQ is not an answer within the
> context of the arrangement and functioning of SQ.
>
> Dave
___
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
