Hi Marsha, thanks for the chance to pointificate.

On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 1:07 PM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> I do not agree.  Intelligence is a species of art, but I do not see
> intelligence
> the same a intellect/intellectual.  I understand intelligence as something
> like:
>
>       Intelligence:
>       The skillful use of whatever patterns (organic, biological, social &
> intellectual)
>       a given situation requires, or possibly to use no pattern, the truly
> dynamic,
>       if nothing else is suitable.



I use the term differently, myself.  For me, intelligence is the cleavage
between inorganic and organic, and intellect is the cleavage between social
and the fourth level.  Intellect is the kindergarten of the fourth level.
 This is important to my understanding because it ties in realistically with
the levels.  What is life but that which exhibits intelligence?  Even an
amoeba is smart enough to come in out of the acid, as opposed to lumps of
matter which just lay there and take dissolution.  That's what I term
"intelligence".

But when objects are conceptualized, we enter the realm of intellect and
reifying these conceptualizations I'd call SOM, the kindergarten of
intellectualism and the position "no serious thinker holds for long."

But of course, all this is my own private interpretation.  I stick to it
only til I find something better.


Intellectual patterns offer the most freedom and that is a good thing, but
> intellectually patterns harbor a big flaw: they do not understand Quality.
>
>

Right.  To perceive Quality requires consciousness. I think it makes sense
to define consciousness as "that which percieves Quality" and recognize it
as a continuum extending mysteriously.  I don't concieve consciousness as a
pattern, that sounds reductionistic.  I see consciousness as that which
perceives patterns, in a creative way.

Thanks marsha,

John
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to