Well it had to happen sometime I guess, Adrie. Iconclastic fervor finds few friends.
I've had a grudge against the guy for ages. I don't know how to explain it. "oooo. look at me, I'm so smart and so helpless - I speak with a computer's voice. I'm special". It's the same aversion I have had against Mother Theresa - the carnival weirdness exploited as some kind of celebrity, regardless of true quality or any smidgeon of real Arete. goading his own wife into beating him, just so he can feel consesquential. gross. COMMENT , Adrie > > sorry to say it , John, but this is the point were our ways separate. > It is a deliberate and malicious choice to make fun about a man in a > wheelchair > wearing a diper, and clearly in need , physically. > > But in fact it is not Hawking that is shitting upon himself, and drewling > all > over the place , it is you , and by free and malicious choice. > you are talking about one of the most important people of the world. > > > George Bush was one of the most important people of the world also. Didn't like him either. I've got a grudge against artificial importance based on freakish celebrity. Deal with it. Or don't. I don't give a shit. Unless I feel like it. Ham: > > > > In short, the Hawkin-Mlodinow team is promoting the view that conscious > > life and the ordered physical universe are mere happenstances that arose > > from the chaos of nothingness. > > > John: sigh. More moronists. The world is full of them. > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > COMMENT Adrie, clearly you have no idea how true this is, you are the > proof. > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > A moronist is not the same as a moron. A moronist is someone who bases their reasoning upon the metaphysical foundation of randomness or UNquality. They say basically shit happens and there is no meaning in any of life or the cosmos. As a firm conclusion, I do find it stupid, even when held by the mind of a genius. COMMENT Adrie, here you and ham are both doing the same in group, by > association. > This is a choice made in advance, this is clearly orchestrated. > > > quite funny to whitness in the background scenery, that platt is chiming in > to > ASS -ociate himself with this fraudulant behaviour, cristianity at its > best. > >--------------------------------------------------------------- > John: I've always maintained that anybody who names a book "a brief > history > of time" and does so non-ironically, is an ass and a philosophical cretin. > > And I bet I could whip him in a game of one on one, as well. > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT Adrie > > > > djeezzzz, this is the view of a visionair, clearly ready to encounter > Hawking on > his work on Black hole's and the embedded informationparadox, Tell me John > at this level,it becomes difficult to me, even for Stephen btw, But can you > work out > the answer on the question, made by the paradox, i level out with you, i > will > give you his e-mail adress, so you can whip him out in a game of one on one > , as well. > But PLEASE, do not forget to post Hawking's answer on your solution, and his > remarks > on this list to show us all how you were able to whip him out in a game of > one on one. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole_information_paradox > > > > > Don't be shy!!I can hardly wait. > > Okay, here we go, [email protected] > > > I give you a tip, as an old friend, let Ham help you, i have no problem > with > that. > > I offer a tip back - "one on one" as in "basketball contest." - Quality as in "all rounder" I know Hawking is smarter than me. And Mother Teresa is undoubtedly more charitable and both are more famous and socially will always be my superiors on the great pyramid of celebrity. But in the end, what good is a woman of God who doesn't believe in God, and a scientific worshipper of rationality who is himself irrational? Time doesn't have a history. To each his own, I guess. I do love a good challenge tho. I'll have to think on yours. I think I'd take up Magnus's ideas of gravity before I'd take Hawking's. drewling John Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
