Time is the keeper of history, Time is the framework in wich the Giant lives
, we all do, as part of the Giant
The duration of Time is Time itself because Time maintains the past as well
as the Future,Time is life,....the Giant is time
The Giant is surroundig us with Time to keep us alive, Time is the Giants
main pattern of value.The bigger frame.
and Btw , Hawking's ideas about gravity are not gravity itself.
Newtons ideas about gravity are not gravity itself.
Einsteins ideas.....etc
Therefore , Magnus ideas about gravity,.....etc , And i told Magnus only
this , what gravity was not .
It needed to be told to him , not to create a new monstruosity, not to make
a fool out of himself.
I strongly think , that Magnus by now , did a lot of investigation on the
web, in books , in articles
to completely reconcider his perceptions on gravity, and to come forth
again,later on , with a more differentiated opinion.
Magnus tuned back a bit , to get into the toolbox of science, fight the
animal, and try to master it, look the bull in the eye's
so to speak, not throw sand in his eye's.
I very strongly suspect that Magnus can take care of himself.
and if i can, i will help Magnus within my possibilities without hesitation.
do i have to remind you that nobody here even bothered
to help him a little bit with his stacks?----as in "nobody"?
Did you chime in with some constructive ideas? show me?--------------
and BTW, is there any progress in your encountering with Stephen on your msn
account to roll over him in a one on one?
I can hardly wait to see the progress in his work, make sure to copy the
loggings to me, so i can crossrefer them with my friend
Steven Van Peteghem, the Physicist , ho works at cern, not as a press liason
officer but as a core scientist in the ATLAS detector
surroundings,....within the beast so to speak.
I'm pretty sure i will talk to him about your solution on Hawking's
problems.
I agree wit you , however that Hawking will not stand a long barfight, or
will encounter the iron man at Hawaii.
But i do not think that you will stand your man in a conversation about
science either.
2010/9/18 John Carl <[email protected]>
> Well it had to happen sometime I guess, Adrie. Iconclastic fervor finds
> few
> friends.
>
> I've had a grudge against the guy for ages. I don't know how to explain
> it. "oooo. look at me, I'm so smart and so helpless - I speak with a
> computer's voice. I'm special". It's the same aversion I have had against
> Mother Theresa - the carnival weirdness exploited as some kind of
> celebrity,
> regardless of true quality or any smidgeon of real Arete.
>
> goading his own wife into beating him, just so he can feel consesquential.
> gross.
>
>
> COMMENT , Adrie
> >
> > sorry to say it , John, but this is the point were our ways separate.
> > It is a deliberate and malicious choice to make fun about a man in a
> > wheelchair
> > wearing a diper, and clearly in need , physically.
> >
> > But in fact it is not Hawking that is shitting upon himself, and drewling
> > all
> > over the place , it is you , and by free and malicious choice.
> > you are talking about one of the most important people of the world.
> >
> >
> >
>
> George Bush was one of the most important people of the world also. Didn't
> like him either. I've got a grudge against artificial importance based on
> freakish celebrity.
>
> Deal with it.
>
> Or don't.
>
> I don't give a shit. Unless I feel like it.
>
>
>
> Ham:
> >
> >
> > > In short, the Hawkin-Mlodinow team is promoting the view that conscious
> > > life and the ordered physical universe are mere happenstances that
> arose
> > > from the chaos of nothingness.
> >
> >
> > John: sigh. More moronists. The world is full of them.
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > COMMENT Adrie, clearly you have no idea how true this is, you are the
> > proof.
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> A moronist is not the same as a moron. A moronist is someone who bases
> their reasoning upon the metaphysical foundation of randomness or
> UNquality. They say basically shit happens and there is no meaning in any
> of life or the cosmos. As a firm conclusion, I do find it stupid, even
> when
> held by the mind of a genius.
>
>
>
> COMMENT Adrie, here you and ham are both doing the same in group, by
>
> > association.
> > This is a choice made in advance, this is clearly orchestrated.
> >
> >
> > quite funny to whitness in the background scenery, that platt is chiming
> in
> > to
> > ASS -ociate himself with this fraudulant behaviour, cristianity at its
> > best.
> >
>
>
>
> >---------------------------------------------------------------
> > John: I've always maintained that anybody who names a book "a brief
> > history
> > of time" and does so non-ironically, is an ass and a philosophical
> cretin.
> >
> > And I bet I could whip him in a game of one on one, as well.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------
> > COMMENT Adrie
> >
> >
> >
> > djeezzzz, this is the view of a visionair, clearly ready to encounter
> > Hawking on
> > his work on Black hole's and the embedded informationparadox, Tell me
> John
> > at this level,it becomes difficult to me, even for Stephen btw, But can
> you
> > work out
> > the answer on the question, made by the paradox, i level out with you, i
> > will
> > give you his e-mail adress, so you can whip him out in a game of one on
> one
> > , as well.
> >
>
>
>
> But PLEASE, do not forget to post Hawking's answer on your solution, and
> his
>
> > remarks
> > on this list to show us all how you were able to whip him out in a game
> of
> > one on one.
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole_information_paradox
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Don't be shy!!I can hardly wait.
> >
> > Okay, here we go, [email protected]
> >
> >
> > I give you a tip, as an old friend, let Ham help you, i have no problem
> > with
> > that.
> >
> >
> I offer a tip back - "one on one" as in "basketball contest." - Quality as
> in "all rounder" I know Hawking is smarter than me. And Mother Teresa
> is
> undoubtedly more charitable and both are more famous and socially will
> always be my superiors on the great pyramid of celebrity.
>
> But in the end, what good is a woman of God who doesn't believe in God, and
> a scientific worshipper of rationality who is himself irrational? Time
> doesn't have a history.
>
> To each his own, I guess.
>
> I do love a good challenge tho. I'll have to think on yours. I think I'd
> take up Magnus's ideas of gravity before I'd take Hawking's.
>
>
> drewling John
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>
--
parser
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
