----- Original Message ----- From: "ADRIE KINTZIGER" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 4:56 AM
Subject: Re: [MD] The Moral Landscape
No , i did not miss the part"direct harm", it is the direct-widget in
combination with the word harm that i find offensive, Platt
the indirect impied implication is lethal,and my gratitude towards the
Liberating Americans, Canadians ans all the
Allied forces is incredible, pure and without questioning.
I am gratefull for all the value's given to us, really , especially the
impact of the Marshall-plan, and the generosity of the
Americans in general. I am one of those rare people, Platt ,visiting
the
Warcemetery's physikally, to pay them respect.
Platt
Glad to hear of your gratitude to America. But, your statement about
"direct harm" is incomprehensible.
And Yes , i strongly believe in free speech, and all this right we
need.
I am also aware of the fact that some social corrections are needed, to
filter out the nature of the beast, the evil within us all.
Free speech, without violating other people's rights.
The rights we need to have, without abuse of rights, rights can be
expoited.
What rights are you talking about. The right not to be offended? Is that
your
idea of a right?
And i will treath you correct , Platt, if you leave your cocoon of
defaitism.
Platt
Another incomprehensible statement.
-----------------------------
So , Platt, to come back on the incomprihensible part,..
Hitler was not a direct harm to his own environment, etc
quoting myself....
"Hitler was not showing direct harm to his own environment on the
"Adelaarsnest"mountain,
Hitler took all responsability and consequenses personally,
together with 6 million evaporated jews and 20 million
european's, The number of Americans that died on Omaha, Utah, etc
beach remains unknown until today.
There are no exact figure's about Poland, Russia, Oekraine, etc.
The pursuit of life liberty, and happiness was called the surch for
'Lebensraum", space to live."-end quote.
Wich part is a problem to understand? the part about the direct harm,
taking
the consequentes, or the defaitism?
Platt
I don't know what Hitler has to do with the discussion. To think for a
moment
that he was the least bit interested in life and liberty for all men is
incomprehensible.
I like to clarify something Platt, you once showed us something of your
work, and i am very convinced that it was of an extraordinary
quality,and i still think it was topquality,proved you are very
intelligent
and capable.
I think you quoted Ant on it, telling you that it was exellent,
and i agree, it was a pearl.
And i honored you for it , Platt, i still do,but to be quit honest,
i think you should leave the stadler& Waldorff balcony, and show some
quality again.
I will treat you correct Platt, if you leave your cocoon of defaitism.
Platt
Another statement I find incomprehensible. Must be the language barrier.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
