Hi Horse, Thanks for the reminder, and I do consult the archives. I just sent a professional response to Dan thanking him for the information. Perhaps you could direct me to certain critical subject headings that you feel would help me out. I will await your response.
Thanks again, Mark (member since 2008) On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Horse <[email protected]> wrote: > Mark > > As Dan says, you haven't, apparently, been around long enough yet to grasp > what's going on here and his suggestion that you consult the archives, > Anthony's work etc. is very apt. What Dan has said is plain good sense and > is said without being rude unlike your reply. > > Cheers > > Horse > > > > On 24/10/2010 15:16, Dan Glover wrote: > >> Mark, you obviously have A LOT of catching up to do before we can hold >> a reasonable discussion. Subject/object metaphysics holds that there >> are only a subject observing objects. Period. Reading your posts, I >> don't see that you've grasped that. When you ask: When is it that >> something enters the SOM realm... something doesn't enter the SOM >> realm. There isn't "something" out there called SOM. That is the >> fallacy that Robert Pirsig tried to correct with his Metaphysics of >> Quality. >> >> And for the record, I am not being silly. It is your lack of >> understanding that makes it seem so. Next thing you'll be calling me a >> retard, I suppose. Not this, not that has nothing to do with the >> definition of the intellectual level. Honestly, I am not teacher, >> Mark. I have very little patience with people who bounce in on their >> high horse spouting how smart they are. A good scientist would do the >> research... read the archives for starters... read Anthony McWatt's >> work... read LILA and ZMM... and if you claim to have read them, read >> them again. You haven't got the message. >> >> Dan >> > > > On 24/10/2010 15:54, 118 wrote: > >> [Mark] >> Hi Dan, >> >> Is that all you've got? Hmmm...Intellectual indeed. Is that what you >> call >> answers? >> >> Well, then, my only response is: Go back to your master, you effing >> rottweiler! You want it your way, there's a nice big bowl of dog food >> waiting for you under the table, snarf it up, it will make you happy. >> Stop >> your pathetic snarling on these airwaves! Don't come back until you have >> something productive to bark about! Go now, shoo,shoo. That's a good >> boy. >> >> Mark >> > > -- > > "Without music to decorate it, time is just a bunch of boring production > deadlines or dates by which bills must be paid." > — Frank Zappa > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
