On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 1:58 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > [Steve] >> No evidence could ever confirm [ID] since it is impossible to even >> imagine evidence that could ever be inconsistent with it. Unless we >> can say what it would be like for ID to be false, it is meaningless to >> science to say that it is true.
Craig: > There could be evidence that ID is true: viz., the Designer shows up, > maybe alters the speed of light, changes the strength of attraction > between the proton & the electron, etc. What there can't be is evidence > that there is no Designer. Steve: That is not what goes by the so-called scientific theory of intelligent design. It isn't about waiting for the designer to show. It is supposed to be about finding evidence of design. As I tried to explain, there can be no such evidence if you allow for an omnipotent designer. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
