On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 4:10 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > [Tim] > can inorganic matter serve as observing subject? I'm almost certain > that: yes; but I just want to make sure. The reason is: there might > always be a lowly sensible subject observing, somehow, Essential > Qualities... >
[Mark] Yes, of course, I am with your certainty. What are we if not inorganic matter. Is there something else that is doing this differentiation? I'm with the US plains indians on this, everything has a soul. We are a good example of such. Mark > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
