Hey Mark --



[Ham]:
You are stating propositions that contradict my ontology.

[Mark]:
No, this was just a sidetrack, to play around with perspectives.

I'm a literalist, so you'll have to tell me when you're playing with me and when you're serious.

If Quality is primary, this does not divide Essence, it just gives it a
different name.  By stating that there is somethingness and nothingness
this also creates division, no matter how much you negate it, you still
need a negator.  Springing into existence doesn't just happen, at least
not according to rational thought.

If Quality is primary we don't need Essence! Would it make you happier if we call Essence Quality? According to Pirsig, Quality divides (or is divided) into patterns. That makes it differentiated in my book. You're right, of course, that Sensibility/Otherness represents a division. But it's a division by nothingness, which makes it phantasmagoric (a phenomenon of appearance) as opposed to real. How can observation by a non-entity confirm a substantive universe? The appearance we accept as physical reality is only a fractionated image of Essence's value. It comes and goes like a flickering candle.

All the order and symmetry that (we imagine) exists in this world of appearances is but a finite representation of the essential "design". You can call THAT "Quality" if you wish; I can find no word to adequately describe it. WE impose the grandeur of that design, along with our own nothingness, on the sensory data that comes to us through experience. The "material world", in other words, is a valuistic synthesis of cognitive sensiblity, organic sensation, and metaphysical nothingness. Only the Value is Real.

And yes, you are right, I am still working on your ontology. I was reading
the mechanical garden again, but then got sidetracked into Principia
Cybernetica, which I guess is no longer around.  But I was curious on
how to make a computer into a philosopher.  Anyway, I'm getting back
on board, and the ball is still in my court.  What is it love-love?
I'm going to get some new balls, hold on.

Principia Cybernetica is still in business; it has simply changed its URL to http://pcp.lanl.gov/ There's an "annotation" of mine in that site under "Freedom", if you are of a mind to read it. Just type this address: http://pcp.lanl.gov/Annotations/FREEDOM.11.html.

Is "what is love" a real or a rhetorical question? Yes, methinks it is due time to have your balls replaced.

Cheers,
Ham
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to