Arlo to John:
Even more interesting was that I was agreeing with you. I was saying that "sadness" would seem to me to be more social than physiological in origin, which is NOT to say that emotions do not effect physiology. Stress amps up your blood pressure, for example, and I think some forms of depression can actually change your brain chemistry.

Andre:
'[James] challenges the usual way of thinking about standard emotions 
-surprise, curiosity, rapture, fear, anger, lust, greed etc- which is that 'the 
mental perception of some facts excites the mental affection called the 
emotion, and that this latter state of mind gives rise to the bodily 
expression'. James says its the other way around: 'My thesis on the contrary is 
that the bodily changes follow directly the perception of the exciting fact, 
and that our feeling of the same changes as they occur IS the emotion...Some 
modern psychologists argue for at least a cognitive component in the process, 
but as late a 1984 James' theory (which was independently brought forward by 
the Danish psychologist Carl Lange the following year and which has since been 
known as the James-Lange theory) was regarded as the starting point for most 
contemporary theories of emotion' ( Richardson, William James, In the Maelstrom 
of American Modernism', (p 242-3)

In your example Arlo, James would argue that BECAUSE 'your blood pressure amps 
up' you feel stress and not the other way around. The physiological change IS 
the emotion. You do not have the perception, then the emotion and then the 
physiological reaction/expression. Which is good too.
In the case of meeting the bear, the (interference of)a 'cognitive component' 
may make the difference between life or death.

I am sure that this is the reason why Pirsig argues that (standard) emotions 
are a biological response to quality.

Imho of course.



Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to