On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 10:17 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Dec 30, 2010, at 9:48 AM, ARLO J BENSINGER JR wrote: > > > [Marsha] > > Language, with it grammatical rules, has most certainly evolved to > reflect > > humanities subject-object metaphysical underpinning. > > > > [Arlo] > > "Grammatical rules" have nothing to do with SOM. Does Western language > reveal > > an SOM-bias in areas where SOM is the dominant intellectual pattern? > Sure. But > > "language" itself is not "SOM". > > > > Marsha: > Nowhere did I explicitly state that language was SOM. It does, though, > implicitly > suggest a subject-object metaphysical underpinning. >
Platt Right. The SOM premise is self-evident and thus invisible to the intellectual level of patterns. . Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
