Since static quality and Buddhism's conventional truths are synonymous, let me
add two more quotes:
"There are different domains of relativity ... Such truths are contingent upon
perspective. This routes us back to a central issue of Buddhism: reification.
Reification is taking something that is true relative to ourselves and
believing it to be true independently of ourselves."
(Wallace, B. Alan, Buddhism with an Attitude, p.138)
"Even when the mind is settled in meditative stabilization without human
conceptual constructs, it is not considered by Buddhist contemplatives to be
entirely free of all traces of conceptualization. One's inborn sense of a
reified self as the observer and the reified sense of the duality between
subject and object are still present, even though they may be dormant while in
meditation; and when one emerges from this nonconceptual state, the mind may
still grasp onto all phenomena, including consciousness itself, as being real,
inherently existing entities. To penetrate to the fundamental nature of
appearances and their relation to consciousness, it is said that one must go
beyond meditative stabilization and engage in training for the cultivation of
contemplative insight."
(Wallace, B. Alan, 'The Taboo of Subjectivity: Towards a New Science of
Consciousness', p.112)
On Dec 31, 2010, at 1:07 PM, MarshaV wrote:
>
>
>
> From a review of the book ‘Buddhism and Science: Breaking New Ground’.
>
> How do we deal with the complexity of experience? Well, we 'seek and find, or
> project, a simplifying pattern to approximate every complex field ... by
> lumping (ignoring some distinctions as negligible) and by splitting (ignoring
> some relations as negligible). Both ... create discreet entities useful for
> manipulating, predicting and controlling ... [but] may impose ad hoc
> boundaries on what are actually densely interconnected systems and then grant
> autonomous existence to the segments. Even the contents of our own
> consciousness have to be dealt with in this way, resulting in our array of
> fragmented self-concepts, and we just put up with the anomalies that arise.
> Buddhism, he explains, agrees that discovering entities is conventionally
> indispensable, but attachment and aggression arise through reifying them,
> which violates the principle that all things are interdependent, and all
> entities are conditional approximations."
>
>
>
>
>
> http://www.westernbuddhistreview.com/vol4/buddhism_and_science.html
>
>
___
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
