Hi Horse, meta-reification ? In this exchange, by renaming the thread as a comment targetted at Marsha, rather than the subject matter, DMB has violated his own quoted words ... "attachment and aggression ARISE THROUGH REIFYING them, which violates the principle that all things are interdependent, and all entities are conditional approximations."
DMB you are reifying the word reify, attaching yourself to your understanding of it and defending it aggressively .... against another person. My perspective .... you, DMB and Marsha actually agree on this subject - what reification is for practical purposes - where you differ is in attitiude to presumed motivations for arguing. IMHO natch. BTW I agree with DMB's one liner that MOQ is ALL about reification (ie avoiding its pitfalls) .... hence my observation on your edict. And hence the supreme IRONY in this recent set if debates .... where DMB incidentally ignores all my attempts to point out the irony, in exchanges with John, Matt etc - ironically of course ;-) Ian On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 8:35 PM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Dec 31, 2010, at 2:35 PM, david buchanan wrote: > >> >> dmb: >> Your own evidence is against you. > > Marsha: > Against me in saying what? First, how do you understand what I've been > saying? Next, how exactly does the quote contradict you assumption? > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
