Hi Arlo,

[Arlo]
This is the problem, I think, with a lot of "top-down" analysis, that
assume the foundation operates with regard or deliberation for the
higher floors. It does not.

The "reason" the inorganic patterns acted as they did is wholly that
doing so was better, inorganically, than not do so. Anything "above"
those inorganic patterns were wholly immaterial and non-existent to
them.

[Mary]
Agree entirely.  When viewed from the top down, the levels are aware
of their predecessors, and as Pirsig points out, far from loving them,
hold them in a kind of smug disdain.  A necessary evil if the level is
wise enough, or an evil to be eradicated if not.  As you say, though,
when viewed from the bottom up, the levels are oblivious to the
existence of any higher.  No opinions in this direction, only
ignorance.

[Mary before]
Would entities on another planet value William James?  I doubt it.

[Arlo]
Would they value Pirsig? Or anything you value? Or even "us" at all?
Maybe to these extra-earth entities, you are a "germ" worthy only of
eradication. Or maybe they would look at us like livestock or pack
animals. How would you argue otherwise?

[Arlo]
Why would Pirsig think that extra-terrestials entities would find no
value (let's assume they are capable of interpreting the language) in
James?

[Mary]
I'm exposing the idea that Pirsig's MoQ offers a metaphysics with much
greater explanatory power than James'.  James' ideas are provincial.
If you were not human, you would find his theories quaint and limited.
 The MoQ, on the other hand, proposes a static evolutionary system
that would be true no matter what the starting point of a universe.
Let's say time and mass were not the initial SPOVs in some alternate
universe.  I am suggesting that the SQ evolutionary logic Pirsig has
employed would hold equally well under any conditions while James'
would not have relevance.

Best,
Mary
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to