Ian/David ... as a definition of static. The difference between static and dynamic is that static is something (a species technically) - a pattern - that persists long enough to have humans attach a name to its concept.
this also makes sense to me. It seems to me, as David suggested, that what Pirsig described in Lila is rather complete all on it's own... I find it more interesting to look for areas in my own life, personally, where I can apply MOQ type thinking - using the philosophy rather than arguing (statically) over the definitions. mm -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ian Glendinning Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 4:58 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [MD] [Bulk] Re: desires (rename to The first division of theMOQ) Hi David, long time ... Yes, completely agree, In fact I tend to reverse your sentence ... > > If you are 'conceiving' of something, is that not some 'thing', therefore some thing static? > ... as a definition of static. The difference between static and dynamic is that static is something (a species technically) - a pattern - that persists long enough to have humans attach a name to its concept. Ian Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
