Ham to Dan:

Ah, and therein lies the controversy.  For if man is not an independent entity, 
he can not exercise the power of Free Will.  Instead he is inextricably bound 
to the laws of nature, just as are earth's evolution and the planetary orbits.  
His choices of good over evil are meaningless, since
his behavior will necessarily follow the cosmic program.  How does this differ from the 
"materialistic doctrine" disparaged by Pirsig?  It's not matter that controls the 
universe, it's an adjective called "Quality".

Andre:
Hi Dan and Ham. I am sure that Dan will respond to you Ham but I have no time 
for this because it seems a waste... . Not that I do not want to but the 
corrections to make to this paragraph alone would require me to write two books 
 to introduce you to a view of reality that will blow your mind. You have been 
here quite a number of years but have not contributed one iota of a further 
understanding of the MOQ on the part of followers and, recently have really 
been counterproductive through pushing your own warped essentialist crap. As if 
your system is perfect. You have done this, among other ways, through appeals 
to qualitative statements that defy your own convictions and assert and enforce 
the approach taken through MOQ glasses. Yet, you are not even aware of 
this...at least you have not acknowledged them.

Yet, you keep on spouting your stuff. You are becoming, in my humble view, a 
distraction. You are not innocently wielding your essence anymore. You are 
pushing questions and forcing answers to undermine the MOQ in your warped way 
and then fill in the vacancies by filling these answers into your 'essential' 
way...and then challenging MOQ contributors to affirm/deny these!

The problem is: the answers are thrown up by the inadequacies of your own (SOM) 
system and not really relevant to an MOQ perspective. You are trying to mix two 
very different...no opposing(!) metaphysics.

What's your beef Ham? Why do you hang around here? As far as I am concerned you 
can hang around on your own site. Get discussions going about your essentially 
proprioceptive agents but, for goodness sake (!) go away...you remind me of 
Marsha...only your objections are patterned and Marsha's are un-patterned. 
Yours are irrelevant and Marsha's are bull.

Needless to say both are superfluous.




Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to