Marsha, Tell me something (useful) that I don't know. Ian
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:32 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Ian, > > On Mar 31, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Arlo Bensinger wrote: > >> "In fact, when proposed that I could perhaps interpret ZMM and Lila in a way >> different from some, this was also met with incredulity. Any good book has >> multiple interpretations, and nobody has rights to the correct >> interpretation." (Marsha) > > > > This quote is not something I ever stated. Arlo is mistaken when > citing me at its source. Another 'oops' mistake. > > > > Marsha > > > > > > -------------- > > On Apr 1, 2011, at 4:59 AM, Ian Glendinning wrote: > >> Arlo, Mark, Mary, Marsha, DMB, >> >> Mary called it an "entre" I call it between a rock and hard place. >> >> Mark said to Arlo "Get a grip". >> I have to say I've had that sentiment in this (and similar) thread for a >> while. >> >> And the others interpreted each others quotes. thus : >> >> Arlo quoted Marsha: >> "In fact, when proposed that I could perhaps interpret ZMM and Lila in >> a way different from some, this was also met with incredulity. Any >> good book has multiple interpretations, and nobody has rights to the >> correct interpretation." >> Arlo said: >> ... I think a sentiment like "it's all interpretation" is readily >> evident. In a world where nobody has rights to the correct >> interpretation, please tell me how Ron's "interpretation" of Pirsig's >> MOQ supporting rape and torture would be dismissed? >> >> dmb says: >> I guess Marsha thinks that interpretive freedom means never having to >> answer any criticism. It means you don't have to worry about making >> sense. Imagine how much work that would save! How how lonely that >> would be. >> >> Ian says, I just want to bring this debate up a level, it's all so >> interpersonal, and as Mary suggests you have to question people's >> motives in the twisted sarcsasm before even looking at the words and >> the subject matter. >> >> Ian >> What's so funny 'bout .... >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 6:18 AM, Mary <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hello Arlo, >>> >>> Pretty late for me on a 'school' night, but your excellent post deserves a >>> response - quickly. >>> >>> [Mary] >>> I disagree with your interpretation of Bo's interpretation. >>> >>> [Arlo] >>> I can tell by this start, that we are going to be in a big disagreement. >>> This sort of "everything is interpretation" type thinking (and no, that is >>> not a quote of anyone) is really faulty, and I argue is very stuck in pure >>> subjectivism. >>> >>> [Mary now] >>> Of course it is stuck in subjectivism. Absolutely! Remember, I am one who >>> thinks the Intellectual Level is SOM all the way, for all of us, all the >>> time. I happen to think that anyone unwilling to admit that is kidding >>> themselves - and I see you, DMB, Andre, and Dan kidding yourselves daily >> Moq_Discuss mailing list >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> Archives: >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html > > > > ___ > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
